Phillip Ozouf Treasury Minister - personal ( edited ) website - blog tells us.
Over the last week or so, the States of Jersey have launched a new way for Jersey to get more involved in the savings initiatives currently underway within the States.
Tomorrow Value Jersey will be officially announced, as a label and online forum that has been created to ensure that the public is kept informed of progress with the savings being made, and also to encourage everyone in the community to take part in creating better value for Jersey on an ongoing basis. It is an easy way to learn more about savings plans, which are continually evolving, and to give us your suggestions for improvements, as well as discuss changes as they are being made.
http://www.ozouf.je/2011/07/value-jersey/#comment-543The submission he refused to publish on his blogg.
I recently read, that the so called golden plated pensions in the UK are to cost higher grade civil servants more by up to £3,000 pounds per year. There are also around half a million jobs aimed at the more managerial type jobs to go, not only but including NHS primary care managerial posts as doctors will be controlling most of the budget.
Then the costs at Whitehall itself and I offer this from the BBC
The government says it saved £3.75bn in 10 months by cutting jobs and projects, and spending less.
Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude described the savings, confirmed by an independent audit, as "staggering".
Rent, advertising, consultants and 17,000 civil service posts were cut between May 2010 and March 2011 as part of measures to cut the UK deficit.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14359927As you are no doubt aware, any person in the UK earning £38,000 pays 20% in tax, earnings after £38,000 attracts tax of 40% and anyone like Mr Izatt and several senior managers in the states and finance, earning more than £150,000 would attract in the UK, tax at 50% after that amount.
Rather than increasing GST which takes more of the low and middle earners ever shrinking disposable income, would it not be fairer to, as an example, tax people earning more than £50,000 a mere 30% and those on over £100,000 40% as the states spending keeps on increasing not decreasing.
At least they would not have to decide whether to eat or heat their homes during the winter, unless they are living far beyond their high earning means.
Boatyboy.