Ben Shenton penned a letter to the JEP (18/9/08) stating the following
' It is my opinion that the current council of ministers are one of the most unprofessional and manipulative groups of individuals I have ever had the misfortune to work with. They represent the wishes of senior civil servants rather than the people of this island and their capacity to mislead their elected colleagues is breathtaking'
In response and again through the pages of the JEP - Frank Walker(19/9/08) replied
'We ( the com ) had no warning of this, no hint that it was to come, ALL his fellow ministers regard this as a stab in the back, if this had taken place a number of months ago I do not believe it would have been possible for his fellow ministers to work with him, but as we do not see him that often at COM meetings anyway, and because there is not going to be any new business over the next few months it is not worth the upheaval. The word is that Senator Shenton will be standing for Chief Minister. If this is the way he treats his colleagues, I do not think his prospects of lasting very long will be that great'
The spat involves a proposition raised by John Le Fondre being debated in the 'house' this coming week concerning raising of tax thresholds and increasing benefits instead of exempting food from GST. Shenton claims that the proposition is not Le Fondres but is actually policy being engineered by senior civil servants,plus Le Sueur and Ozouf and is actually government policy dressed up as a private members bill.
If these allegations are true what do such allegations actually mean?
If Ben Shenton actually has such a low opinion of his coleagues surely he shoudl resign? If the Chief Minister thinks that his Shenton is so dishonourable, and does not pull hi sweight in the COM - sack him!
If the Le Fondre proposition is merely an Ozouf/Le Sueur/ Senior Civil Servant proposition -why the cloak and dagger approach?
This proposition should get through if it is debated next week, I actually believe that Le Fondre is just a front man and that the policy is not all his own work - surely it make sense to engage civil servants in policy formation - they earn enough and many of them are highly qualified individuals.
Superficially we have a chamber of 53 independant politicians - in reality we we have a ruling elite known as 'The Establishment Party'..........this composes of the Council of Ministers and numerous sympathisers in the ranks.
There are insufficient 'non establishment party' politicians to put up any purposeful opposition to the majority of propositions brought before the house.
The electorate are obviously happy with this set up as 70% don't bother voting - if Mr Shenton thinks his letter is breaking news - forget it - the majority are not bothered...................stick to your day job Ben Shenton!