If you particularly want to ask Jeremy anything you can always email him on
j.macon@gov.jeOn the subject of the incinerator - I've been doing loads of research and quizzing so many people - if you knew even half of the information that is out there and the amount of lies and half truths we're fed, you might not feel so complacent about the new incinerator. The most important factor has got to be health and TTS have this agenda where they had decided on this type of incinerator and where they were going to build it and come hell or high water that was what they were going to do. The fact is that time and new methods have come on since they began looking into a replacement for the old incinerator and they simply refused to carry on looking.
I haven't come across anything in my research that is 100% safe but I would have liked to see a team of unbiased Jersey residents go over to Canada to see the plasma gasification plant because I don't believe we looked at that thoroughly enough. I can't see that shipping our fly ash to Norway is going to be cost effective in the long run and I am horrified at the size of the monstrosity they are going to build next to the most populated and lowest lying part of Jersey.
We do have the highest incidences of some kinds of cancer already in Jersey, despite what our Medical Officer of Health says and some of her statements make me wonder whether she is really concerned primarily with our health. EG she claims that the incidences of these kinds of cancers being higher in Jersey is due to our lifestyle ie drinking and smoking more than people in the UK - I question that statement and the other old chestnut we get from pro-incinerator people that our cancer rate is in part due to living on granite - funny how all of these longstanding characteristics of life in Jersey have only in recent years resulted in a rash of these cancers?
The reason I became interested in the incinerator issue is because my father has one of these cancers (doesn't drink and hasn't smoked since he was 30 and even then only a couple a day - if that) and the cancer specialist at the general hospital told him that we had more of these cancers than the UK and that's what got me asking why this should be.
One of the basic commonsense suggestions I came across was that if we have to have an incinerator it should be at the highest point of land available and where the prevailing winds blow the dioxins away from the population. We are doing exactly the oppposite.
Anyway, what do you think?