Hi,
I have just seen this one.
To Rico Sorda: All the money for FranK ???Do you mean the increase in the budget for the Chief Ministers Department ? Yes, I did agree that. The Assembly had a report stating that the expanded work of the CM , especially in the external areas relating to Brussels and London was deficient and we approved an extra amount of money. Did you know the Constable of St. Helier has a P.A, and the Chief Minister did not ? It is the office of the Chief Minister we are dealing with not Frank Walker. If the next Chief Minister wants to change things , whether it is going to be Terry Le Sueur, Ben Shenton, Philip Ozouf, Freddie Cohen or Paul Routier (they are the only possible runners) then so be it.
On toxic ash and Stuart's proposition for a Committee of Enquiry. I voted against that. This infill on the West of Albert was done in the early 80's. It is now about to be excavated again. That has started on the Castle Quay development. Whoever authorised the dumping of the bottom ash and fly ash down there was very wrong. In the 25 years since then, all environemental issues are now so much to the fore and sensitive and rightly so. I think it would have been an almost no return for taxpayers money to haul some retired civil servants before a committee and the same for one or two retired politicians.
On GST, I voted against GST everytime.I then voted against exemptions. We must keep GST simple. We cannot have a UK VAT look a like monster. That takes battalions of civil servants to do the exempting. If we have to have the bloody thing, then this clamour for exemptions will give any future Treasury Minister carte blanche to raise the base rate. I don't agree with that. I don't agree with GST as I am still unconvinced we need it. It is the GST is the problem, not GST on food.
Sean