No. I thought long and hard about it, but I think the States and senior civil service is unable to embrace change, largely because most States members cannot believe they have a modicum of power and a 40 grand salary. So taking a big wage cut, working longer hours, being in the public eye and being unable to change anything - its not really attractive, is it? Which is why it only appeals to the otherwise unemployable. You going for it, presumably?
Power systems do not generally change unless one of two conditions prevails. One is they perceive they are facing unstoppable momentum for change, the other is revolution. In a democracy we strive for the former in the hope of averting the latter.
It is however a mistake to think that power in a democracy lies with the elected members. Yes they have privileges and can introduce or enact laws. But they are in reality only vectors. The real power, the thing that brings on change is ideas. Ideas spread by people prepared to express, explain and educate. There is no better platform for bringing ideas to people’s attention and arguing for a different way of doing things than the election process.
It is not about winning, nor even about taking part, it is about lighting the blue touch paper of an explosive idea. That's why the PPC's upcoming proposal to have a £500 deposit to stand is an affront to democracy. It all but debars ordinary people with extraordinary ideas from doing that which the democratic process was meant to encourage.
Nothing is as powerful as an idea whose time has come (Victor Hugo)
Be a democrat, do your duty. Stand and serve, or wait silently for the revolution.